Listing of Issues in 2001 IDEA Complaint Decisions

01-001

  1. Did the district fail to evaluate a child for a suspected disability in a timely manner when requested in March 1999?

     

  2. Did the district fail to provide a child with a disability a free appropriate public education (FAPE) between August 23, 2000, and January 4, 2001, when the child had a significant number of school absences due to truancy and suspensions?

     

  3. Did the district fail to provide the parent of a child with a disability, upon request, access to her child's educational records prior to an individualized education program (IEP) team meeting?

 

01-002
Did the district fail to provide the parent of a child with a disability, upon request, access to her child's educational records prior to an individualized education program (IEP) team meeting?

 

01-003

  1. Did the district fail to convene IEP meeting in timely manner? This complaint was withdrawn.

     

  2. Did the district fail to provide proper notice of refusal to change child's placement? This complaint was withdrawn.

 

01-004
On January 21, 2000, did the district violate a provision of the child's October 1999 individualized education program related to physical therapy?

 

01-005
Did the district deny a free appropriate public education to a child with a disability by refusing to enroll the student in school from September 25, 2000, until January 12, 2001, after the child had moved from the Milwaukee Public Schools district?

 

01-006

  1. Did the district, during the fall of 2000, revise the individualized education program (IEP) for complainants' child without conducting an IEP team meeting?

     

  2. Did the district fail to safeguard the confidentiality of the child's education records when it provided information to expert witnesses following a request by the parent for a due process hearing?

 

01-007

  1. Did the district fail to provide the parent of a child with a disability a copy of her daughter's individualized education program (IEP) in a timely manner when requested in January 2001?

     

  2. Did the district fail to schedule an IEP team meeting at a time mutually agreed to by the district and the child's parent to review and revise the child's IEP when requested by the parent in January 2001?

 

01-008

  1. Did the district fail to implement transition services in the individualized education programs (IEPs) for two students with disabilities (students A and B)?

     

  2. Did the district fail to implement the current IEPs for the two students with disabilities, due to lack of qualified personnel, during the 2000-2001 school year?

 

01-009

  1. Did the district fail to have an individualized education program (IEP) in effect causing a lapse in special education and related services after January 19, 2001?

     

  2. Did the district fail to provide IEP team members with a copy of the January 9, 2001, IEP in a timely manner?

 

01-010

  1. Did the district fail to fully implement the due process hearing order dated January 28, 2000?

     

  2. During the current school year, did the district violate provisions of the child's IEP that require implementation by a speech and language therapist?

     

  3. In June 2000 and in January 2001, did the district fail to provide the complainants with full access to their child's education records?

 

01-011
Did the district fail to provide a free appropriate public education (FAPE) for her child when they failed to convene an IEP meeting to review and revise, if appropriate, her child's IEP to address the child's interruption of educational services when he was repeatedly sent home from school over a six-week period? This complaint was withdrawn.

 

01-012
Did the district conduct IEP team meetings in which the LEA representative was not knowledgeable about and/or was not authorized to commit district resources to meet the needs of the child with a disability?

 

01-013

  1. Did the district fail to determine the child's progress toward goals in areas of math, language arts-reading, written language, and expressive/receptive language as required in the individualized education program (IEP)?

     

  2. Did the district fail to ensure that staff responsible for implementing portions of the child's IEP were informed of their responsibilities?

     

  3. Did the district fail to provide supplementary aids and services for the child by making materials available in a timely manner for adaptation and pre-teaching before class instruction as provided in the IEP?

     

  4. Did the district fail to provide specially designed instruction in the following areas as required in the IEP:
    1. one-on-one instructional time for language arts, math, science and social studies,
    2. friendship group,
    3. replacing curriculum for foreign language and decision class?

     

  5. Did the district fail to provide program modifications or supports for school personnel in the following areas as required in the IEP:
    1. two 20 minute meetings per month and on-going consultation and support from the program support teacher,
    2. assistive technology consultation one to two hours per month,
    3. materials and communicate unit expectations one week in advance?

 

01-014

  1. Did the district improperly change the placement of a child with a disability for the 2000-2001 school year without conducting an individualized education program (IEP) team meeting?

     

  2. Did the district fail to provide a child with a disability a free appropriate public education (FAPE) between October 1, 2000, and February 28, 2001, when the child had a significant number of school absences?

 

01-015
Did the district conduct an IEP team meeting for the student on February 28, 2001, without the required participants?

 

01-016
This complaint was withdrawn.

 

01-017

  1. During the 2000-2001 school year, did the district fail to develop a current individualized education plan (IEP) for the child?

     

  2. During the 2000-2001 school year, did the district fail to convene an IEP team meeting for the child following a request for a meeting by the child's mother?

     

  3. During the 2000-2001 school year, did the district improperly place the child in ninth grade?

     

  4. During the 2000-2001 school year, did the district deny the child a free appropriate public education by failing to provide speech and language services?

 

01-018

  1. Did the district fail to the meet the child's needs as identified in the functional behavior assessment (FBA) completed on January 8, 2001?

     

  2. Did the district fail to conduct a timely functional behavior assessment of the complainants' child following behavior problems during the 1999-2000 school year?

     

  3. Did the district, on or about November 28, 2000, release the child's educational records to the police without the complainant's consent?

     

  4. Did the district improperly exclude the child from school for more than 10 days during the 1999-2000 and 2000-2001 school years?

     

  5. Did the district, on February 20, 2001, violate a provision of the child's IEP and behavior intervention plan that requires the district to contact the complainant regarding the child's behavior problems before contacting the police?

 

 

01-019
Did the district fail to schedule a March 21, 2001, individualized education program IEP team meeting at a mutually agreed on time?

 

01-020
Did the district deny a child with a disability a free and appropriate public education (FAPE) when speech and language therapy services required by the child's individualized education program (IEP) were not provided from August 2000 through March 2001? This case was determined by a due process hearing.

 

01-021
Did the district fail to implement complainants' child's May 2000 individualized education program (IEP) by not providing individual (one-on-one) and group instruction in the resource room, as described in the child's IEP?

 

01-022

  1. Did the district fail to implement provisions of the child's current individualized education program (IEP) related to the amount and frequency of special education vision services?

     

  2. Did the district fail to provide supplemental aids and services as outlined in the child's IEP, including the use of a computer and software, use of Braille textbooks, and having assignments Brailled?

     

  3. Did the district fail to inform the complainant of the extent to which the child's progress toward annual goals is sufficient to enable the child to achieve the goals by the end of the year?

01-023
Did the district fail to respond in a timely manner to the complainants' request on January 15, 2001, for an individualized education program (IEP) team meeting?

 

01-024
Did the district fail to provide the parent of a child with a disability, upon request, access to her child's educational records prior to a March 7, 2001, individualized education program (IEP) team meeting?

 

01-025
Did the district fail to provide a child with a disability a free appropriate public education (FAPE) between January 29, 2001, and March 23, 2001, when the child had a significant number of school absences?

 

01-026

  1. Did the district fail to conduct an annual review of the child's individualized education program (IEP) prior to its expiration date in February 2001?

     

  2. Did the district fail to regularly inform the complainant of the extent to which the child's progress toward annual goals is sufficient to enable her to achieve the goals by the IEP ending date?

01-027
Did the district fail to implement provisions of the child's 2000-2001 individualized education plan (IEP) related to weekly charting and providing progress reports to the complainant?

 

01-028
Did the district fail to implement provisions of the child's individualized education program (IEP) requiring preferential seating, shortened assignments and extra time to complete assignments?

 

01-029
Did the district fail to implement provisions of the child's individualized education program (IEP) permitting the student to dictate writing assignments, requiring teachers to check the child's assignment notebook daily, and requiring extra time to complete tests?

 

01-030
Did the district IEP team improperly determine that the child does not need speech/language and sign language services?

 

01-031
Did the district, on February 7, 2001, make individualized education plan (IEP) determinations related to reading instruction and the amount of special education services based upon district resources, rather than upon the child's needs? This complaint was withdrawn.

 

01-032

  1. Did the district fail to properly determine the placement of a child with a disability?

     

  2. Did the district fail to respond properly to the parent's request for an individualized education program (IEP) team meeting?

     

  3. Did the district fail to schedule an IEP team meeting at a mutually agreed on time?

     

  4. Did the district fail to provide occupational therapy services consistent with a child's IEP, between March 21 and April 14, 2001?

 

01-033

  1. Did the district, during the 2000-2001 school year, fail to implement, for keyboarding class, the child's individualized education program (IEP) allowing the child to utilize program accommodations noted in the IEP addendum? This complaint was withdrawn.

     

  2. Did the district, during the 2000-2001 school year, fail to ensure that an IEP team meeting conducted on December 12, 2000, included at least one regular education teacher of the child? This complaint was withdrawn.

 

01-034

  1. Did the district fail to conduct an individualized education program (IEP) team meeting at least annually to review and, as appropriate, revise the student's IEP?

     

  2. Did the district fail to ensure that, to the extent appropriate, at least one regular education teacher of the student attended IEP team meetings conducted after April 19, 2000?

     

  3. Did the district fail, at least one year before the student attained the age of 18, to inform the student of the transfer of parental rights at age 18?

     

  4. Did the district fail to specify in IEPs developed after April 19, 2000, the amount of special education and related services to be provided to the student so that the level of commitment of resources is clear to the parent and IEP team participants?

     

  5. Did the district fail to provide special education services required by the student's IEPs developed after April 19, 2000?

     

  6. Did the district fail to implement the provision of the student's IEPs developed after April 19, 2000, requiring consultation for regular education classroom teachers with a learning disabilities teacher?

     

  7. Did the district fail to regularly inform the parent of the student's progress toward his annual goals and the extent to which that progress is sufficient to enable him to reach the goals during the period of IEPs developed after April 19, 2000?

 

01-035
Did the district fail to provide the related services of transportation and a special education aide as extended school year services, consistent with a child's individualized education program (IEP)?

 

01-036

  1. Did the district fail to provide a child with a disability a free appropriate public education between September 5, 2000, and April 25, 2001, when the child had a significant number of school absences?

     

  2. Did the district fail to determine at a March 29, 2001, individualized education program (IEP) team meeting whether the child requires transportation as a related service?

     

  3. Did the district fail to provide the parent a notice of placement and a copy of the child's IEP that was developed at a March 29, 2001, IEP team meeting before implementing the IEP?

 

01-037

  1. Did the district fail to consider the student's need for supplemental aids and services to be provided to enable the child to progress in the general environment?

     

  2. Did the district fail to implement provisions added to the child's individualized education program (IEP) during the year requiring supplementary aids and services?

 

01-038

  1. Did the district fail, during the 2000-2001 school year, to determine the child's progress toward annual goals in areas of math, language arts-reading, and science or social studies as required in the individualized education program (IEP)?

     

  2. Did the district fail to ensure that special education teachers supervise special education aides and that aides do not perform professional teaching responsibilities?

     

  3. Did the district fail to provide supplementary aids and services for the child by making materials available in a timely manner for adaptation and pre-teaching before class instruction as provided in the IEP?

     

  4. Did the district fail to provide specially designed instruction in the following areas as required in the IEP:
    1. one-on-one instructional time from a special education teacher for language arts and math, and special education teacher support/instruction in areas other than math and language arts;
    2. friendship group,
    3. replacing curriculum for foreign language and decision class?

     

  5. Did the district fail to provide program modifications or supports for school personnel in the following areas as required in the IEP:
    1. two 20-minute meetings per month and on-going consultation and support from the autism program support teacher,
    2. assistive technology consultation one to two hours per month,
    3. materials and communicate unit expectations one week in advance.

 

01-039
Did the district fail to provide a free, appropriate public education (FAPE) in the least restrictive environment (LRE) which would enable her child to participate in the general curriculum and be educated with non-disabled children to the maximum extent appropriate?

 

01-040

 

  1. Did the district, during the 2000-2001 school year, fail to provide an English class and an anger management program as required by the child's IEP?

     

  2. Did the district improperly remove the child from school for more than 10 days?

 

 

01-041
Did the district, during the 2000-2001 school year, fail to provide a child with a disability a free appropriate public education (FAPE) by repeatedly suspending him from school?

 

01-042
Did the district fail to have an agency representative knowledgeable about and authorized to commit district resources to meet the needs of a child with a disability at an individualized education program (IEP) team meeting held on May 16, 2001?

 

01-043
Did the district fail to dispense a child's medication, as required by the child's individualized education program (IEP)?

 

01-044

  1. Did the district fail to attempt to arrange the child's May 16, 2001, IEP team meeting at a mutually agreed time and place?

     

  2. Did the district fail to take proper steps to ensure parent participation at the May 16, 2001, IEP team meeting?

 

01-045

  1. Did the district improperly respond to parent requests on May 12 and June 1, 2000, to have individualized education program (IEP) team meetings?

     

  2. Did the district fail to include services in the December 7, 2000, IEP to meet the child's educational needs related to transportation?

     

  3. Did the district fail to properly conduct an IEP team meeting on December 7, 2000, to review, and, as appropriate, revise the child's IEP?

 

01-046
Did the district, during the 2000-2001 school year, fail to provide a child with a disability a free appropriate public education (FAPE) by repeatedly suspending him from school?

 

01-047

  1. Did the district, during the 2000-2001 school year, make changes to the child's March 22, 2001, individualized education program (IEP) without conducting an IEP team meeting?

     

  2. Did the district fail to provide the parents with prior written notice of its refusal to provide extended school year (ESY) services to their child?

 

01-048

  1. Did the district fail to have in effect a current IEP for a child after December 5, 2000?

     

  2. Did the district fail to implement, during the 2000-2001 school year, a child's individualized education program (IEP) with a beginning date of December 6, 1999, and ending date of December 5, 2000?

     

  3. Did the district fail to have required participants attend March and May 2001 IEP team meetings held to develop an IEP and determine placement for the child?

 

01-049

  1. Did the district fail to arrange a child's June 8, 2001, individualized education program (IEP) team meeting at a mutually agreed time with the required participants at the meeting?

     

  2. Did the district improperly exclude the child from school for more than ten days during the 2000-2001 school year?

01-050
Did the district fail to properly reevaluate the complainant's child for a learning disability or an emotional disturbance?

 

01-051

  1. Did the district fail to include required participants during a February 21, 2001, individualized education program (IEP) team meeting for the student?

     

  2. Did the district fail to implement the portions of the student's February 21, 2001 IEP requiring the assistance of a special education aide and requiring contact with the student's case manager during incidents on March 8, 27 and 29, 2001?

     

  3. Did the district fail to determine the student's need for extended school year (ESY) services following parent request?

     

  4. Did the district fail to determine the amount of homebound instruction based on the student's individual needs, and not solely based on administrative convenience?

 

01-052

  1. Did the district, regarding an individualized education program team meeting held on June 14, 2001, fail to provide proper notice to the parent?

     

  2. Did the district fail to include as a participant a representative of the local educational agency (LEA) who is knowledgeable about available district resources?

     

  3. Did the district fail to determine whether the child requires the services of an aide?

     

  4. Did the district fail to determine whether the child needs additional services due to a lapse in occupational therapy services?

     

  5. Did the district fail to clarify the nature of the occupational therapy services to be provided as required in complaint decision #01-032?

01-053
Did the district, during the 2000-2001 school year, fail to properly evaluate a student for the disability of other health impairment?

 

01-054
Did the district fail to properly determine an educational placement for a child with a disability? 01-055

  1. Did the district, during the 2000-2001 school year, fail to complete the child's most recent reevaluation and review the child's individualized education program (IEP) and placement in a timely manner?

     

  2. Did the district fail to implement the provisions of the child's IEP related to participation in chorus?

 

01-056

  1. Did the district, during the 2000-2001 school year, fail to reevaluate a child with a disability in a timely manner?

     

  2. Did the district fail to include the child's regular education teacher as an individualized education program (IEP) team participant during the reevaluation?

 

01-057
Did the district, in July 2001, fail to provide the related service of transportation as extended school year services, consistent with a child's individualized education program (IEP)?

 

01-058

  1. Did the district, in July 2001, fail to provide services consistent with the extended school year (ESY) provisions of a child's individualized education program (IEP)?

     

  2. Did the district fail to include on the child's June 7, 2001, IEP team a representative of the local educational agency (LEA) who is knowledgeable about and authorized to commit the available resources of the LEA?

 

01-059
Did the district, during the 2000-2001 school year, fail to follow requirements related to removing a child with a disability from school for more than ten days in a school year?

 

01-060

  1. Did the district, during the 2000-2001 school year, fail to include required participants in an individualized education program (IEP) team meeting in May 2001?

     

  2. Did the district, during the 2000-2001 school year, fail to review and, if appropriate, revise at least annually the child's IEP dated May 31, 2000?

     

  3. Did the district, during the 2000-2001 school year, fail to consider, in developing the child's IEP, supplementary aids and services to enable the child to participate in extracurricular activities and the parent's concerns for enhancing the education of her child?

     

  4. Did the district, during the 2000-2001 school year, fail to respond timely to the parent's request for copies of the child's education records?

 

01-061

  1. Did the district fail to provide proper notice to the parent of its refusal to retain the child?

     

  2. Did the district fail to schedule an individualized education program (IEP) team meeting in a timely manner following the parent's requests in August 2001?

 

01-062
Did the district improperly change the educational placements determined for two children with disabilities on June 14, 2001, without conducting individualized education program (IEP) team meetings?

 

01-063
Did the district fail to include the complainants in the determination of their child's placement during an individualized education program (IEP) team meeting held in June, 2001? This complaint was withdrawn.

 

01-064
Did the district fail to implement the provisions of the youth's individualized education program (IEP) at the beginning of the 2001-2002 school year?

 

01-065
Did the district fail to implement the provisions of the child's individualized education program (IEP) at the beginning of the 2001-2002 school year? 01-066

  1. Did the district, during the 2001-2002 school year, fail to allow the parent to participate in the most recent IEP team meeting?

     

  2. Did the district, during the 2001-2002 school year, revise the child's IEP without holding an IEP team meeting?

     

  3. Did the district, during the 2001-2002 school year, fail to include in the IEP related services needed by the child?

01-067

  1. Did the district fail to provide the speech and language services required by the child's individualized education program (IEP) during the 2001-2002 school year?

     

  2. Did the district fail to properly notify the parents of an IEP team meeting to be held in late September or early October 2001 and to schedule the meeting at a mutually agreed on time?

     

  3. Did the district fail to provide the parents, prior to the IEP team meeting, with the child's recent assessment materials following their request?

     

  4. Did the district fail to include in the child's IEP the frequency of the services to be provided?

     

  5. Did the district fail to consider the parents' concerns for enhancing the education of their child?

01-068
Did the district, since September 6, 2001, fail to provide special education and related services, including door-to-door transportation, to the child as required by his IEP? 01-069

  1. Did the district improperly change the placement for a child with a disability?

     

  2. Did the district fail to ensure that the child's individualized education program (IEP) was accessible to staff responsible for its implementation between August 27 and September 11, 2001?

     

  3. Did the district fail to respond properly to the parent's request for an IEP team meeting?

     

  4. Did the district fail to provide a child with a disability a free appropriate public education (FAPE) after September 11, 2001, when the child had a significant number of school absences?

01-070
Did the district fail to provide an educational placement to implement the individualized educational program (IEP) for a child with a disability at the beginning of the 2001-2002 school year?

 

01-071
Did the district fail, during the 2001-2002 school year, to implement the individualized education programs (IEPs) of two children with disabilities?

 

01-072
Did the district, during the 2000-2001 school year, improperly reduce the payment to a parent for an independent education evaluation of her child submitted to the district in August 2001?

 

01-073
Did the district failed to implement the current individualized education program (IEP) of the complainant's child in regard to services to be provided by regular education teachers; specifically:

  1. that some of her child's regular education teachers say the IEP is not stated in a manner that is understandable to them and the special education staff responsible for implementing it;
  2. there are instances where a regular education teacher has refused to follow the IEP in regard to allowing extended time for assignments and tests;
  3. there are instances where a regular education teacher has refused to follow the IEP in regard to completing progress reports which state what and when assignments are due;
  4. regular education teachers were not inserviced at the beginning of the school year as required by the IEP; and,
  5. that weekly meetings between special education teachers and regular education teachers are not taking place?

 

01-074
Did the district, during the 2000-2001 school year, fail to provide the parent with proper notice of its refusal to provide requested services to the child? This complaint was withdrawn.

 

01-075

  1. Did the district fail to respond in a timely manner to the parent's request for an individualized education program (IEP) team meeting for her child?

     

  2. Did the district fail to provide the parent's copies of her child's special education records?

01-076
Did the district, during the 2001-2002 school year, fail to implement the individualized education program (IEP) of a child with a disability?

 

01-077
Did the district fail to provide adaptive physical education and the related service of weekly physical therapy consistent with the December 19, 2000, individualized educational program for a child with a disability during the 2001-2002 school year? This complaint was withdrawn.

 

01-078

  1. Did the district fail to provide, during the 2001-2002 school year, a child with a disability, as required by his individualized education programs (IEPs) developed on May 17 and September 10, 2001, with daily access to a computer to complete written assignments; speech and language therapy, occupational therapy, and adaptive physical education services? Currently in abeyance.

     

  2. Did the district fail to include in the child's May 17 and September 10, 2001, IEPs, needed autism consultation services, including for staff training; needed speech and language therapy, occupational therapy, physical therapy, and adaptive physical education services; an explanation of the extent to which the child will not participate with nondisabled children in extracurricular and other nonacademic activities and include a statement of supplementary aids and services needed to participate in such activities? Currently in abeyance.

     

  3. Did the district fail to respond appropriately to the parents' request during the summer of 2001 for an independent educational evaluation of the child and, during the May 17 IEP team meeting, for the child be provided with the supplementary service of assistance by an aide? Currently in abeyance.

     

  4. Did the district fail to properly respond to the parents' concerns regarding the ending date of the May 17 IEP? Currently in abeyance.

     

  5. Did the district fail to ensure that the IEP team considered a present level of performance and annual goal related to speech and language therapy before including it in the May 17 IEP. Currently in abeyance.

     

  6. Did the district fail to clearly state in the child's September 10, 2001, IEP, the amount, frequency and location of special education services, related services, supplementary services and aids, and program modifications or supports for school personnel; and type of special education services, related services, supplementary services and aids for regular education classes, and program modifications or supports for school personnel. Currently in abeyance.

01-079

  1. Did the district, during the 2001-2002 school year, fail to properly determine an educational placement for a child with a disability?

     

  2. Did the district, during the 2001-2002 school year, fail to safeguard the confidentiality of a child's education records by releasing personally identifiable information in a school board meeting notice and during a board meeting?

01-080

  1. Did the district, during the period October 25, 1998, to October 24, 2001, fail to include in the individualized education program (IEP) of a child with a disability proper statements of the child's present levels of performance, annual goals, and short-term objectives, and the amount of special education and related services, supplementary aids and services and program modification and supports for school personnel to be provided to the child?

     

  2. Did the district, during the period October 25, 1998, to October 24, 2001, fail to properly inform the child's parent of the child's progress toward his annual goal?

     

  3. Did the district, during the period October 25, 1998, to October 24, 2001, fail to periodically convene an IEP team meeting to review the child's IEP to determine whether the child's annual goals are being achieved?

     

  4. Did the district, during the period October 25, 1998, to October 24, 2001, fail to implement behavioral interventions, strategies and supports included in the child's IEP?

     

  5. Did the district, during the period April 2001 to October 24, 2001, fail to respond properly to parent requests for IEP team meetings to review and, if necessary, revise her son's IE?

     

  6. Did the district, during the period April 2001 to October 24, 2001, fail to provide notice to the parent a reasonable time before the district proposed to change her son's IEP?

     

  7. Did the district, during the period April 2001 to October 24, 2001, fail to properly respond to the parent's request to review and receive copies of her son's education records?

01-081

  1. Did the district, on October 24, 2001, fail to provide the parent advocate of a child with a disability, upon request, access to a child's educational records prior to an individualized education program (IEP) team meeting?

     

  2. Did the district, on October 24, 2001, fail to inform the parent of a child with a disability of his right to be provided with additional time and a copy of the evaluation report at the beginning of the IEP team meeting?

     

  3. Did the district, on October 24, 2001, fail to properly change the placement for a child with a disability?

01-082
Did the district, during the 2001-2002 school year, fail to provide a child with disabilities with special education services required by his individualized education program (IEP)? This complaint was withdrawn.

 

01-083
Did the district, during the 2001-2002 school year, fail to provide a child with disabilities with special education services required by his individualized education program (IEP)?

 

01-084
Did the district fail to properly develop an individualized education program (IEP) and determine placement for a student following his transfer from another state in April 2001?

 

01-085

  1. Did the district, during the 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 school years fail to have an IEP team conduct an annual review and, as appropriate, revise the student's individualized education program (IEP)?

     

  2. Did the district, during the 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 school years fail to provide special education, including related services and transition services, to the student pursuant to a valid IEP?

01-086
Did the district, during the fall semester of the 2001-2002 school year, fail to provide a child with a disability a free appropriate public education (FAPE) when the child was sent home from school each day at 10:00 a.m.?

 

01-087
Did the district, during the 2001-2002 school year, fail to provide the following services consistent with the child's IEP: seating accommodations, testing and assignment modifications, and monitoring progress on long-range assignments?

 

01-088

  1. Did the district, during the 2001-2002 school year, fail to ensure that staff responsible for implementing portions of the child's IEP were informed of their responsibilities?

     

  2. Did the district, during the 2001-2002 school year, fail to provide special education services to the student utilizing a properly licensed teacher?

     

  3. Did the district, during the 2001-2002 school year, fail to provide testing modifications required by the child's IEP?

     

  4. Did the district, during the 2001-2002 school year, fail to provide the child with access to a computer, as required by his IEP?

     

  5. Did the district, during the 2001-2002 school year, fail to implement the child's IEP on days when his teacher was sick or transportation was not available?

     

  6. Did the district, during the 2001-2002 school year, fail to regularly and properly inform the child's parents of the child's progress toward his IEP goals?

     

  7. Did the district, during the 2001-2002 school year, fail to properly respond to the parents' request to review their child's education records?

     

  8. Did the district, during the 2001-2002 school year, fail to properly notify the parents of an individualized education program (IEP) team meeting to be held on November 13, 2001, and fail to schedule IEP team meetings held on November 13, December 6, and December 13, 2001 at mutually agreed upon times?

     

  9. Did the district, during the 2001-2002 school year, fail to include required participants in the November 13th IEP team meeting?

     

  10. Did the district, during the 2001-2002 school year, fail to provide the child's mother with more time in response to her request at the December 13th IEP team meeting?

     

  11. Did the district, during the 2001-2002 school year, fail to obtain informed consent from the parents before conducting tests as part of the child's reevaluation?

     

  12. Did the district, during the 2001-2002 school year, fail to properly consider whether the child is a child with a disability by reason of other health impairment (OHI)?

     

  13. Did the district, during the 2001-2002 school year, fail to include in the child's current IEP a proper statement of his present levels of educational performance and a supplementary aid and service related to the child's nutritional needs?

     

  14. Did the district, during the 2001-2002 school year, fail to provide educational services to the child at Omro High School on December 18 through 21, 2001, and on January 2 through 4, 2002?

01-089
Did the district, during the 2001-2002 school year, fail to implement provisions of the child's individualized education program (IEP) requiring oral tastes of food during the lunch period?

 

01-090

  1. Did the district, during the 2000-2001 school year, fail to schedule a November 26, 2001, individualized education program (IEP) team meeting at a mutually agreed on time and properly notify the parent of who would attend the meeting?

     

  2. Did the district, during the 2000-2001 school year, fail to safeguard the confidentiality of a student's education records by releasing personally identifiable information to other students on November 13, 2001?

01-091
Did the district, during the 2001-2002 school year, fail to implement the provisions of a child's individualized educational plan (IEP) related to participation in chorus? This complaint was withdrawn.

 

01-092
Did the district deny a free appropriate public education (FAPE) to a child with a disability by refusing to enroll the student in school after the student became a resident of the district?

 

01-093
Did the district, on December 7, 2001, fail to provide the parent advocate of a child with a disability, upon request, access to a child's educational records prior to an individualized education program (IEP) team meeting?

 

01-094
Did the district, by refusing to enroll a child from November 9, 2001 to January 14, 2002, fail to provide a free appropriate public education to a child with a disability residing in the district?

 

01-095

  1. Did the district, during the 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 school years, fail to review the individualized education program (IEP) of a child with a disability periodically to determine whether the child's annual goals are being achieved and revise the IEP as appropriate?

     

  2. Did the district, during the 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 school years, fail to include required participants in IEP team meetings for the child?

     

  3. Did the district, during the 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 school years, fail to provide a free and appropriate public education to a child with a disability, due to a significant number of school absences due to truancy and suspensions?

     

  4. Did the district, during the 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 school years, fail to regularly inform the child's parent of the child's progress and the extent to which the child's progress is sufficient to enable the child to achieve his IEP goals?

     

  5. Did the district, during the 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 school years, fail to provide services to the child as required by the child's IEPs?

01-096

  1. Did the district fail to implement, during second semester of the 2000-2001 school year, provisions of an individualized education program (IEP) for a child with a disability related to academic instruction?

     

  2. Did the district fail to obtain parental consent prior to reevaluating a child with a disability during second semester of the 2000-2001 school year?

     

  3. Did the district fail to properly notify the parents of an IEP team meeting held in November 2001?

     

  4. Did the district fail to include as IEP team participants during the November 2001 IEP team meeting individuals who had conducted independent educational evaluations (IEEs) of the child?

     

  5. Did the district fail to include the parents in the development of their child's educational program and the determination of the student's placement during a November 2001 IEP team meeting?

     

  6. Did the district fail to timely provide the parents with a copy of their child's IEP and ensure staff responsible for implementing the child's IEP are informed of their specific responsibilities following the November 2001 IEP team meeting?
For questions about this information, contact Patricia Williams (608) 267-3720